Locals object to glamping pods in one of Ardmore's 'last remaining unspoilt areas'

Plans for glamping pods, which were rejected by Waterford City and County Council, will now be reviewed by An Coimisiún Pleanála.

The planning application was submitted to Waterford Council in May by applicants David and Laura Mulcahy.

The plans outlined the intention to construct glamping accommodation in Ardmore.

A total of five glamping pods were planned at a 0.9 acre site, which is currently in agricultural use in the Dysert area.

The site is a long, narrow, rectangular parcel of land that sits adjacent to St. Declan’s Walk and the coastline to the east.

Car parking for up to five cars and dedicated cycle parking was to be developed within the site.

A design report, prepared on behalf of the applicants, outlines that the development of glamping in the area aims to support both tourism and biodiversity.

The report said: "Our client's wish to set up a business that will support tourism in the area and improve biodiversity on the site, returning the majority of the site to its original and ideal habitat.

"Our client's aim is to model the highest standards in sustainable tourism, both in the manner of construction, energy efficiency and creation of habitat for biodiversity."

The applicant intended to employ a local manager to run the site.

The decision to reject the development was made by Waterford City and County Council in July, following a number of objections, which were submitted by concerned locals.

One appeal letter, submitted by John Mansfield and Amanda Hosford Mansfield, said that the proposed development would bring "significant increased traffic volumes" into the area.

The letter also stated that the development would increase gorse fire risk due to "open fires, fire pits and barbeques".

Local Sinn Féin councillor Kate O’Mahoney also voiced concerns over the development, writing that the construction of housing in the area should be prioritised.

“With regards to any proposed development in Ardmore, it is important to keep the ongoing housing crisis in the village in mind" her submission reads.

“What locals need is affordable housing for people. Reliance on what should be family homes to cater to the tourist industry is adding to the housing problem for locals.

“Although it is not the developers’ job to solve the housing crisis, it is a matter that must be addressed without further delay.” 

Another appeal, submitted by John and Paula King, said that the proposed development is "within metres of critically important seabird breeding sites."

The appeal added: "It is not credible to suggest that potential renters will be screened to be sure they are not noisy holiday makers or hen and stag groups.

"We think the developers are attempting to create a gated holiday community exploiting one of Ardmore’s last remaining unspoilt areas." 

The case is due to be decided by December 8.