'Shergar wasn’t a mare!'- Fifth day of trial of fraud-accused woman over purchase of French horse
The trial of Catherine O'Brien, of An Grianan, Ballinroad, Dungarvan, is taking place at Waterford Courthouse.
The trial of fraud-accused Catherine O’Brien went into its fifth day on Wednesday in Waterford Courthouse, with the defence calling a witness.
John Walsh appeared on Wednesday, July 9, at Waterford Circuit Court before the jury of five men and seven women and Judge Eugene O’Kelly.
Mr Walsh said he was a farmer and the owner of Bishopstown Stud in Lismore, Co. Waterford, with "50, 60 years" of experience with horses.
He told defence counsel, Simon Donagh BL, that he had a "business relationship" with Catherine O’Brien. He said they had bought thoroughbred stallion Shakeel in "February, March 2018" from breeder Aga Khan, through their company Classic Thoroughbreds. He noted that the stallion came 1st place at the Grand Prix de Paris.
Mr Walsh said that he had bought the thoroughbred stallion in a "three-way partnership" along with Ms O’Brien and Edward Hawe. He claimed that they were running a "syndicate" and that Ms O’Brien carried out "the paperwork" under his instruction. On the purchase of the stallion, he said: “Katie O’Brien was representing the syndicate.”
Throughout the day, Mr Walsh referred to the accused alternately as ‘Kate’, ‘Katie’ and ‘Catherine’.
Catherine O'Brien, of An Grianan, Ballinroad, Dungarvan, Co Waterford, has pleaded not guilty to three charges of making gain or causing loss by deception contrary to Section 6 of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001.
Mr Walsh told the court that he had met the complainant John Blake at Coolnahay Stud in Co Westmeath in February 2018. He said: “I showed him [Shakeel] and he was very happy. A deal was brokered for the breeding rights.” [Mr Blake paid €20,000 for these breeding rights.] “Catherine, or Kate, O’Brien met him at a hotel after and finalised the documentation per my instruction, so Blake bought two nominations.”
Mr Walsh detailed that a broodmare of ‘top-class pedigree’ was purchased soon afterwards off French agent Guy Petit, which had an initial asking price of €30,000 and was bought for €24,750.
Mr Walsh said that the name of the horse was ‘Shamalana’, a mare that was sired by thoroughbred stallion Sinndar.
He said: “She arrived in Ireland, she was in my care and it was up to me to look after her, which I duly done.”
According to the witness, Shamalana was successfully covered by Shakeel in April 2018 and had a foal. Mr Donagh asked if Wetherby’s were made aware of the covering and he said: “It was done by Catherine O’Brien on my behalf’. [Annette Doyle of Weatherby’s earlier confirmed a report that Shakeel had covered a mare named Shamalana.]
Throughout the questioning by the defence, Mr Walsh reiterated that the accused worked under his instruction.
He said that in late 2018, he showed Mr Blake the mare, which was a light brown colour, also known as a "bay mare".
Pointing at Detective Garda Joe Wyse, Mr Walsh said: “This man kept insisting on a grey mare called Lingreville.”
Mr Walsh said at one point that he "didn’t know" a mare by that name. However, he did state: “I happened to write it [Lingreville] on top of the pedigree form for Sinndar” and “couldn’t recall why”.
State prosecutor Conor O’Doherty asked the witness why the name ‘Lingreville’ was written in his handwriting on the top of the pedigree document. Mr Walsh responded: “I can’t remember why but we never had that mare.”
Mr Walsh also said that it was common practice in the equine industry to refer to mares by their sire's name, i.e: Shamalana/ Sinndar.
Mr Walsh said that when Mr Blake confronted him about the issue on his farm in Lismore in September 2019: “ I could see he was not a suitable person, he would be far better off if we terminated his agreement.”
Mr Walsh said he offered to pay Mr Blake €45,000 in three instalments of €15,000. When asked later why Mr Blake received a settlement of €22,000 two years later, Mr Walsh said: “That’s what he agreed to and he was very happy with it.”
The settlement referred to the mare Shamalana as being incorrectly named ‘Lingreville’.
Mr Walsh couldn’t give "an approximate date" for when he transferred money for Shamalana’s transport to Guy Petit, saying “probably December or January” and that ‘Kate O’Brien’ paid the sum on his behalf.
The witness said: “She was doing the paperwork and I was looking after the day-to-day running of the horses.”
Mr O’Doherty asked about Classic Thoroughbreds and whether there were any official documents that declared it as an official limited company. Mr Walsh said that he paid €85,000 for Shakeel himself. After some back and forth, Mr Walsh said that the ‘syndicate’ was intended to be a racing club but was disbanded in 2018 after being set up in May that same year. No document was presented.
Mr Walsh suggested that Mr Blake made his own decision in investing in the breeding rights and the broodmare. He said: “It’s up to the owner to get mares, not me.”
Mr O’Doherty asked if a "guaranteed" return of €14,000 on an unproven stallion would be "Bernie Madoff levels of return?” Mr Walsh replied: “It might be a success or a failure.”
The prosecutor followed up: “That anyone can hit the genetic jackpot?”
Mr Walsh responded: “It’s possible.”
Mr O’Doherty stressed: "No one is getting €14,000 on an unproven horse. This seems to be something like a Ponzi scheme.”
Showing messages between the accused and the complainant, Mr O’Doherty said that Ms O’Brien was "flat out lying to a vulnerable, elderly man".
In the messages between Ms O’Brien and Mr Blake, the defendant refers to herself as buying Shakeel and naming her "friend and barrister" Michael Egan as the owner. The reason for this, she explained in messages, was because "nobody would take a woman seriously".
Mr O’Doherty asked him if he knew who Michael Egan was.
He answered: “He’s like you – he’s an eminent barrister.”
Mr Walsh said that the barrister transferred "money to France for Shakeel, this has nothing to do with him".
Mr O’Doherty asked the witness why in September 2019 his wife told Mr Blake the truth about the mare.
Mr Walsh said: “I don’t know why, she spoke out of turn.”
The Court heard that Mr Walsh was arrested by Gardaí in June 2020 and was informed that he would not be prosecuted in September 2021, a month before the purported settlement of €22,000.
Mr O’Doherty said that the settlement was "an attempt to frustrate a criminal prosecution".
Mr Walsh denied the claim to which Mr Doherty asked: “Then why did he [Mr Blake] get €22,000?”
Mr Walsh said: “Well, that’s what he agreed to!”
Mr O’Doherty rejoined: “The document might as well say "mare called ‘Shergar’ for all the legal standing it has.”
At this, Mr Walsh said: “Shergar wasn’t a mare! He agreed to that, he was very happy to accept that!”
Mr O’Doherty raised a statement made by Mr Walsh to the Gardaí in June 2025 and his initial statement in 2019. He noted a large number of contradictions between his statements and his oral testimony, particularly the year he gave as to when he met Mr Blake.
Mr Walsh said: “You don’t have to be in every statement when you have a gentleman’s agreement, or a lady’s agreement, you don’t have to put everything down.”
When asked about several misspellings [he claimed to have mistakenly written down Shamalana as ‘Shamalanna’] he told the court: “I left school at 14 years of age. I wasn’t privileged to get a first, second, third level education.”
He said in his Garda statement that he had been dealing with the accused "for the last three, four years" and that their relationship was "strictly business".
Mr O’Doherty asked him why he made that clarification, to which Mr Walsh said: “You’re defaming my character!” During the cross-examination, the jury were given a 10-minute break due to the air conditioning breaking down.
After the brief pause, the cross-examination continued. Mr Walsh said that in September 2019, Mr Blake and his grandson left his home "happily" after he told them that he would pay them a sum of €45,000.
The trial continues today, Thursday, July 10, with the defendant Ms O’Brien taking to the witness box to give evidence.
